cheat catcher
finding evidence of election tampering is pretty tricky. perpetrators generally don't fess up to it. there might be a few ways though. suppose that like us, the iranians voted on measures in addition to selecting a president. common sense says there should be a correlation between voting for ahmadinejad and voting for conservative issues. and a correlation between voting for mousavi and voting for moderate issues. this argument was used in a recent us election. certain counties voted 80% for democrats and left issues yet voted 80% for the conservative presidential candidate. nothing much came of it. other than a bunch of exasperated arm waving. cause it was pretty trivial to tamper with vote counts and not get caught. good thing we vote on secure systems now. oh wait. sigh. anywho, expect even less in iran. except maybe dead people.