shrill voices
the first amendment protects unpopular speech. yeah yeah it protects all speech. but who cares? popular speech doesn't need protecting. anywho, you get all kinds of kooks saying all kinds of kooky things. on one hand, you'd really like to muzzle some of them. but as long as they're not yelling fire, or inciting criminal activity, then we really can't. sigh. on the other hand, do we really want to? their shrill voices are like an irresistible siren call to the the ignorant fucks among us. it is convenient this makes it easy to identify such individuals who might have otherwise passed themselves off as intelligent beings capable of independent coherent thought. but, you have to suffer public "debates" based on passion instead of facts and reason. tastes great. less filling. thank god for the second amendment.