cru
sorry it took so long to post on the emails data and source files stolen from the east anglia climate research unit. i was busy grepping my hard drives for keywords like "trick" and "fudge". also scanned my emails for the past 13 years for things that might be embarrassing if they found their way into the hands of my worst enemies. specifically the ones that send me death threats. usually with bad grammar and worse spelling. anywho. what does it mean for science? not much. politically the deniers are still in denial. the believers are totally like what emails? and the consensus among scientists is still somewhere in between. many of whom are looking at the trouble makers in the hot seat with renewed expectation, can we see your data and models now? what say we're a little more professional with our critics in the future? sheehs. anywho, i don't recommend any extreme. cause your files could be stolen next. and *poof* there goes your career. anywho, i thought i'd share some views i consider as sympathetic to true believership as i can stomach
link. and as much snarky i'm-right-and-you're-wrong cynicism as i can stand
link. enjoy.